The Fall
of the Old Kingdom
in Ancient Egypt
One of the
basic beliefs in ancient Egyptian society was the concept of ma’at. Personified by a winged goddess of the same name, ma’at is sometimes interpreted as “truth” but, more
accurately as “universal order”. Every aspect of Egyptian life was lived
according to this principle; it permeated everything they did: their art, their
culture, even the rule of their kings. But around 2180 BCE, ma’at
broke down. Power had been shifting away from the old capital at Memphis for at least two
generations until finally, when Pepi II died, the power of the central government disappeared
completely.
From the time Narmer first unified Upper and Lower
Egypt, the Pharaoh’s power over his subjects grew steadily. The immense
pyramids at Dahshur, and Giza (along with the Great Sphinx)
are a testament to their ability to govern individuals and resources. It
would’ve taken thousands of workers to complete Kufu’s
Great Pyramid within the 25 years or so of his reign. Especially
since most workers were farmers and could only work during the third of the
year when the swollen Nile covered their
fields.
It seems that
even with the immense building projects on the west bank of the river, though
after the 4th dynasty these projects began to diminish in size,
farmers were still able to pull an excess of food from their fields. This
bounty, along with prosperity in other areas (such as trade), began to make
local nobles very wealthy and less dependent on the god-king at Memphis. Taxes and
tributes began to wan, and with them the authoritarian central government.
The fall of
the Old Kingdom was not to be the only
instance of this phenomenon. It happened again almost 2000 years later, with
the fall of the 21st dynasty. The only difference was that power
began to flow to the priests of Amun, instead of to
local nobles. What these instances do
have in common, however, says a lot about the Egyptian way of life. They were a
very pragmatic people, as a whole. Even their concept of the afterlife was, in
fact, exactly the same as their life on Earth. Religion,
including the god-king and temple priests, were distant, mystic forces. Egypt was also
a long, narrow country. Many people never even saw the seat of imperial power
in their lifetimes. Their local nobles, however, were tangible. It was much
easier to put one’s trust in a local leader rather than a distant, imperial
one.